Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 3:28:35 GMT
The civil guard accused of the audios revealed by Economist & Jurist maintains that the statements he made in the recordings are false and respond to a strategy
Magistrate Santiago Pedraz has upheld the request for proceedings from one of the defenses in the case in which the brigadier of the Organic Unit of the Judicial Police of the Civil Guard of Madrid, Sergio Bravo, is being Fax Lists investigated. The results produced by the practice of these proceedings could represent a serious setback to the version maintained until now by the civil guard, who has maintained that everything he said in the audios revealed by Economist & Jurist , in which he boasted of being “the most illegal of illegals”, was part of an individual investigation strategy and the data provided was false.
In an order to which this media has had access, the head of the Central Court of Instruction number 5 of the National Court requires the DGT and the municipal police of Madrid to provide the license plate records to locate the vehicle of one of the suspects, whose monitoring was explained in detail by the civil guard to his interlocutor and was recorded in the published recordings. This person, with whom he had a relationship, was completely unrelated to the investigation and the police force. If the recordings show that the vehicle was in the place indicated in the audio, it would have provided true data.
In this sense, the magistrate also addresses the Organic Unit of the Judicial Police of the Civil Guard in Madrid (Tres Cantos), to report on whether, among the agents with the identification numbers that appear in the follow-up reports, certain first names are given that the civil guard uses in his conversation. An undercover agent (this would not be the case according to the provisions of article 282 of the LECrim) would never reveal the real names of his colleagues .
Among the authorized procedures, it has also been requested that the hotel in which the civil guard spent part of a night with the person to whom, according to his story, he was trying to show an easily corruptible profile (in order to facilitate access or reveal data of the members of the criminal organization that was being investigated, the main object of the investigation that is underway), report on the payment method regarding the room in which he stayed. If it was with a card, you are asked to know who it corresponded to.
Magistrate Santiago Pedraz has upheld the request for proceedings from one of the defenses in the case in which the brigadier of the Organic Unit of the Judicial Police of the Civil Guard of Madrid, Sergio Bravo, is being Fax Lists investigated. The results produced by the practice of these proceedings could represent a serious setback to the version maintained until now by the civil guard, who has maintained that everything he said in the audios revealed by Economist & Jurist , in which he boasted of being “the most illegal of illegals”, was part of an individual investigation strategy and the data provided was false.
In an order to which this media has had access, the head of the Central Court of Instruction number 5 of the National Court requires the DGT and the municipal police of Madrid to provide the license plate records to locate the vehicle of one of the suspects, whose monitoring was explained in detail by the civil guard to his interlocutor and was recorded in the published recordings. This person, with whom he had a relationship, was completely unrelated to the investigation and the police force. If the recordings show that the vehicle was in the place indicated in the audio, it would have provided true data.
In this sense, the magistrate also addresses the Organic Unit of the Judicial Police of the Civil Guard in Madrid (Tres Cantos), to report on whether, among the agents with the identification numbers that appear in the follow-up reports, certain first names are given that the civil guard uses in his conversation. An undercover agent (this would not be the case according to the provisions of article 282 of the LECrim) would never reveal the real names of his colleagues .
Among the authorized procedures, it has also been requested that the hotel in which the civil guard spent part of a night with the person to whom, according to his story, he was trying to show an easily corruptible profile (in order to facilitate access or reveal data of the members of the criminal organization that was being investigated, the main object of the investigation that is underway), report on the payment method regarding the room in which he stayed. If it was with a card, you are asked to know who it corresponded to.